Triple
T26897174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eternal winter |
E677925
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedMagic |
P49967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ice magic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ice magic | Statement: [Eternal winter, associatedMagic, ice magic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedMagic Context triple: [Eternal winter, associatedMagic, ice magic]
-
A.
associatedMystic
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to another through a mystical, spiritual, or esoteric association.
-
B.
usesMagic
Indicates that an entity performs actions or achieves effects by employing magical powers or supernatural abilities.
-
C.
involvesMagic
Indicates that the related action, event, or relationship includes the use or presence of magical powers, forces, or phenomena.
-
D.
usesMagicFor
Indicates that one entity employs or applies magic as a means to achieve, affect, or perform something involving another entity or context.
-
E.
associatedWithMagicType
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something is linked or connected to a particular type or category of magic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9befee48190a26f214faa867be7 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff8aff48988190a48a440de8238ef9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff8a780404819082f48ceb21e7fe11 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:48 a.m.