Triple

T26894464
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Saraikis E677862 entity
Predicate macroLinguisticGroup P27696 FINISHED
Object Lahnda NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lahnda | Statement: [Saraikis, macroLinguisticGroup, Lahnda]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: macroLinguisticGroup
Context triple: [Saraikis, macroLinguisticGroup, Lahnda]
  • A. macrolanguageGrouping chosen
    Indicates that one language is classified as part of a broader macrolanguage grouping that encompasses multiple closely related language varieties.
  • B. arealLinguisticGroup
    Indicates a relationship where languages are grouped together based on shared features arising from geographic proximity and contact, rather than common genetic origin.
  • C. majorLanguageGroupOf
    Indicates that one language group is the primary or dominant linguistic classification to which another language or set of languages belongs.
  • D. macrolanguageMemberOf
    Indicates that a language variety is classified as a member of a larger macrolanguage grouping.
  • E. linguisticSubgroup
    Indicates that one linguistic group forms a subordinate or specialized subset within a larger linguistic group or family.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9befee48190a26f214faa867be7 completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f61f6ac6ac8190be96a4211305dbbe completed May 2, 2026, 3:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611af72ac819094598dd2530d7411 completed May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:47 a.m.