Triple
T268894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alright |
E5582
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAlbumSequence |
P3284
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Get Lifted track listing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Get Lifted track listing | Statement: [Alright, hasAlbumSequence, Get Lifted track listing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlbumSequence Context triple: [Alright, hasAlbumSequence, Get Lifted track listing]
-
A.
hasPartInDiscography
Indicates that an entity (such as a song, album, or track) is included as a component within another entity’s discography.
-
B.
hasTrack
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a specific track (such as a path, course, or recorded item).
-
C.
hasMelody
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular melody.
-
D.
hasBand
Indicates that an entity is associated with or includes a particular band (e.g., musical group or band-like unit).
-
E.
hasSpecialSong
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular song that is unique, distinctive, or specially designated for it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25853594c8190b05ec3a586ec88bf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25db00ed48190be6f598807265356 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b70d99c819085d8381a313a2a34 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m.