Triple

T26880930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cedar Creek E676890 entity
Predicate hasErosionRole P161977 FINISHED
Object contributed to formation of Natural Bridge NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contributed to formation of Natural Bridge | Statement: [Cedar Creek, hasErosionRole, contributed to formation of Natural Bridge]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasErosionRole
Context triple: [Cedar Creek, hasErosionRole, contributed to formation of Natural Bridge]
  • A. hasErosionEffect
    Indicates that one entity causes or exhibits an erosive impact or degradation effect on another entity or surface.
  • B. hasErosionFeature
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or contains a specific erosion-related feature or form resulting from erosional processes.
  • C. hasErosionalState
    Indicates the current degree or condition of erosion affecting an entity’s surface or structure.
  • D. erosionRate
    Indicates the rate at which material is worn away or removed from a surface over time due to erosive processes.
  • E. erosionResistance
    Indicates how strongly one entity can withstand or prevent being worn away, degraded, or removed by erosive forces caused by another entity or the environment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9bb44988190b6e11652d028bc59 completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62081136c81909de8090b1d6c1ac5 completed May 2, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3d23f481908dfec27adace900a completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f61fd5442081908ca677a9c81dcb3f completed May 2, 2026, 4:01 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:39 a.m.