Triple

T26877792
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Earl of Ross (jure uxoris, disputed) E676801 entity
Predicate disputeNature P107087 FINISHED
Object legitimacy of jure uxoris claim to Earldom of Ross LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legitimacy of jure uxoris claim to Earldom of Ross | Statement: [Earl of Ross (jure uxoris, disputed), disputeNature, legitimacy of jure uxoris claim to Earldom of Ross]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputeNature
Context triple: [Earl of Ross (jure uxoris, disputed), disputeNature, legitimacy of jure uxoris claim to Earldom of Ross]
  • A. disputeOrigin
    Indicates that there is disagreement or uncertainty about the source, cause, or initial point of something.
  • B. disputeInvolves
    Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
  • C. disputeIssue chosen
    Indicates that there is a disagreement or conflict specifically concerning a particular issue or point of contention.
  • D. disputed
    Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
  • E. originatingDispute
    Indicates that one entity is the source, cause, or initial context of a particular dispute involving another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9bb44988190b6e11652d028bc59 completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f61fd623bc819091df736cf3419b99 completed May 2, 2026, 4:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3d23f481908dfec27adace900a completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:37 a.m.