Triple
T26870393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PARNAS party |
E676594
|
entity |
| Predicate | stanceOnJudiciary |
P98442
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial independence from executive power |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial independence from executive power | Statement: [PARNAS party, stanceOnJudiciary, judicial independence from executive power]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stanceOnJudiciary Context triple: [PARNAS party, stanceOnJudiciary, judicial independence from executive power]
-
A.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
B.
constitutionalBodyInvolved
Indicates that a constitutional body participates in, is responsible for, or is otherwise formally involved in the referenced action, process, or decision.
-
C.
judiciaryProvision
chosen
Indicates the legal or constitutional rules, arrangements, or measures that establish, organize, or govern the functioning of the judiciary.
-
D.
proposedJudiciary
Indicates that an entity has formally suggested or put forward another entity to serve in a judicial role or as part of a judicial body.
-
E.
judiciaryAct
Indicates that an entity is involved in, established by, or otherwise directly related to a specific judiciary act or piece of judicial legislation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9ba94bc8190b44c5d4397d04ecd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:32 a.m.