Triple
T26869936
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Houston Aeros (WHA) |
E676581
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableForward |
P199455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Andre Hinse |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Andre Hinse | Statement: [Houston Aeros (WHA), notableForward, Andre Hinse]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableForward Context triple: [Houston Aeros (WHA), notableForward, Andre Hinse]
-
A.
notablePlay
Indicates that a particular play is especially famous, significant, or noteworthy in relation to the entity it is associated with.
-
B.
notableCornerback
Indicates that the subject is recognized as an especially distinguished or prominent cornerback in American football.
-
C.
notableLinebacker
Indicates that the subject is a linebacker who is particularly prominent, distinguished, or well-recognized in that role.
-
D.
notableWin
Indicates that one entity achieved a particularly significant or distinguished victory over another or in a specific event.
-
E.
notablePlayQuarterback
Indicates that the subject is notably recognized for playing the position of quarterback, typically in a significant or distinguished context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9ba94bc8190b44c5d4397d04ecd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff3b32ee148190a3ba3b7600943fef |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff3a238af88190a2c2245e30299e48 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff3b323a748190827165f1cb274141 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:31 a.m.