Triple
T26865125
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ranst |
E676443
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProtectedHeritage |
P163831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historic farms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historic farms | Statement: [Ranst, hasProtectedHeritage, historic farms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtectedHeritage Context triple: [Ranst, hasProtectedHeritage, historic farms]
-
A.
hasHeritageValueFor
Indicates that something possesses cultural, historical, or heritage significance for a particular entity or community.
-
B.
hasCulturalProtection
Indicates that an entity is subject to legal or formal measures intended to preserve and safeguard its cultural value or heritage.
-
C.
hasHeritageOfSite
Indicates that a site possesses or is associated with a particular heritage designation, tradition, or cultural-historical value.
-
D.
isPartOfHeritage
Indicates that something belongs to, contributes to, or is recognized as a component of a broader cultural, historical, or natural heritage.
-
E.
hasHeritageElements
chosen
Indicates that something contains or includes elements that are part of a cultural, historical, or natural heritage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9ba94bc8190b44c5d4397d04ecd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd592e48cc81909d754cc6c4bd99ae |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd58b7f9b881909dc099b28d567784 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:28 a.m.