Triple
T26864014
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inner Gorge |
E676414
|
entity |
| Predicate | erosionalAgent |
P103214
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Colorado River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Colorado River | Statement: [Inner Gorge, erosionalAgent, Colorado River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: erosionalAgent Context triple: [Inner Gorge, erosionalAgent, Colorado River]
-
A.
erosionAgent
chosen
Indicates the natural force or process responsible for wearing away, transporting, or reshaping material from a surface.
-
B.
erosionRate
Indicates the rate at which material is worn away or removed from a surface over time due to erosive processes.
-
C.
geomorphologicalProcess
Indicates a relationship where one entity undergoes or is shaped by natural earth-surface processes that modify landforms and terrain structure.
-
D.
erosionResistance
Indicates how strongly one entity can withstand or prevent being worn away, degraded, or removed by erosive forces caused by another entity or the environment.
-
E.
hasErosionalState
Indicates the current degree or condition of erosion affecting an entity’s surface or structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9ba94bc8190b44c5d4397d04ecd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61e961a7c81908c3a7f6aebaf1242 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:27 a.m.