Triple
T26850739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dartmoor ponies |
E676050
|
entity |
| Predicate | coatColorRestriction |
P161534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | piebald and skewbald not permitted in pedigree stock |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: piebald and skewbald not permitted in pedigree stock | Statement: [Dartmoor ponies, coatColorRestriction, piebald and skewbald not permitted in pedigree stock]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coatColorRestriction Context triple: [Dartmoor ponies, coatColorRestriction, piebald and skewbald not permitted in pedigree stock]
-
A.
coatColorSymbol
Indicates the symbolic or coded representation used to denote an entity’s coat color in a standardized form.
-
B.
hasBarkColor
Indicates the color or colors of an entity’s bark.
-
C.
coatColorFemale
Indicates the coat color characteristic specifically associated with female individuals of a species.
-
D.
maneAndTailColor
Indicates that two entities are related by one having a mane and tail of the specified color.
-
E.
typicalCoatColor
Indicates the usual or most common coat color associated with an entity, such as an animal or breed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9b9d7708190a15d7485709ae981 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61b91003881908a3cf1f494a5b046 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6142a0b988190b404d078f73c3cb9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:16 a.m.