Triple

T26840685
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coimbatore SEZ E675766 entity
Predicate hasIncentiveType P7916 FINISHED
Object fiscal incentives LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fiscal incentives | Statement: [Coimbatore SEZ, hasIncentiveType, fiscal incentives]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIncentiveType
Context triple: [Coimbatore SEZ, hasIncentiveType, fiscal incentives]
  • A. typeOfIncentive chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of incentive associated with an entity or action.
  • B. usesIncentive
    Indicates that one entity employs or applies an incentive (such as a reward, benefit, or motivation) to influence the behavior or decisions of another entity.
  • C. offersIncentive
    Indicates that one entity provides a reward, benefit, or motivation to another entity to encourage a specific action or behavior.
  • D. hasBenefitType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or type of benefit it provides or receives.
  • E. providesIncentivesTo
    Indicates that one entity offers rewards, benefits, or motivations to another entity to encourage a desired behavior or outcome.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eee9b8d5e88190a07d3455c0fbb21f completed April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcd867f36081908c88c55a6a1404c1 completed May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd1f47b188190b4cf4b4c748d9d03 completed May 7, 2026, 5:55 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:07 a.m.