Triple
T26831581
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gigantopithecus |
E675512
|
entity |
| Predicate | inferenceBasis |
P58039
|
FINISHED |
| Object | comparative anatomy with living apes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparative anatomy with living apes | Statement: [Gigantopithecus, inferenceBasis, comparative anatomy with living apes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inferenceBasis Context triple: [Gigantopithecus, inferenceBasis, comparative anatomy with living apes]
-
A.
supportsInferenceOf
Indicates that one entity provides a logical basis or justification for concluding or deriving another entity.
-
B.
epistemicBasis
Indicates the justificatory relationship by which one piece of information, belief, or evidence serves as the basis for holding another belief or knowledge claim.
-
C.
empiricalBasis
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the empirical evidence, data, or observational support underpinning the validity or justification of another entity.
-
D.
isBasedOn
Indicates that one entity is derived from, inspired by, or developed using the content, structure, or principles of another entity.
-
E.
basingConcept
Indicates that one concept serves as the foundational basis or underlying rationale for another concept.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9b776448190993a60b67fcc9545 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61add1c9481909c2d458019e45ecf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:01 a.m.