Triple
T26828627
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cecily Cardew |
E675435
|
entity |
| Predicate | guardianRelationshipType |
P10690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | adoptive ward |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adoptive ward | Statement: [Cecily Cardew, guardianRelationshipType, adoptive ward]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: guardianRelationshipType Context triple: [Cecily Cardew, guardianRelationshipType, adoptive ward]
-
A.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
B.
relationshipType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
C.
parentRelationship
Indicates a familial relationship in which one entity is the parent of another entity.
-
D.
relationshipToParents
Indicates the type or nature of a person's familial relationship to their parents.
-
E.
ageRelation
Indicates a relationship that specifies or compares the ages of entities, such as one being older, younger, or of the same age as another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9b776448190993a60b67fcc9545 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61adb3c348190ac6b1744ee520276 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5 a.m.