Triple

T2682818
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MICROSCOPE E57413 entity
Predicate testsConcept P463 FINISHED
Object equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass | Statement: [MICROSCOPE, testsConcept, equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testsConcept
Context triple: [MICROSCOPE, testsConcept, equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass]
  • A. introducedConcept
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
  • B. featuredConcept
    Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
  • C. demonstratedConcept chosen
    Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
  • D. hasConcept
    Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
  • E. challengedConcept
    Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a5028388190a36f3baf1588309e completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd9d602848190b638e417e710a555 completed March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd81c9b4c81908e5e0da6ac5f828b completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.