Triple

T2682320
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Betts v. Brady E57400 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Betts v. Brady E57400 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Betts v. Brady | Statement: [Betts v. Brady, fullName, Betts v. Brady]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Betts v. Brady
Context triple: [Betts v. Brady, fullName, Betts v. Brady]
  • A. Betts v. Brady chosen
    Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
  • B. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • C. Gebhart v. Belton
    Gebhart v. Belton was a landmark Delaware school segregation case whose rulings in favor of Black students became one of the four consolidated cases decided in Brown v. Board of Education, contributing to the Supreme Court’s rejection of “separate but equal” in public education.
  • D. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • E. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a5028388190a36f3baf1588309e completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd9d602848190b638e417e710a555 completed March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afa06c7a908190ae3463bf3e204fa6 completed March 10, 2026, 4:39 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.