Triple
T26822033
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. The Amistad |
E675271
|
entity |
| Predicate | treatyCited |
P75436
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Adams–Onís Treaty |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Adams–Onís Treaty | Statement: [United States v. The Amistad, treatyCited, Adams–Onís Treaty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatyCited Context triple: [United States v. The Amistad, treatyCited, Adams–Onís Treaty]
-
A.
treatyMention
chosen
Indicates that a treaty is referenced or mentioned in relation to the associated entities or context.
-
B.
treaty
Indicates a formal, negotiated agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, that defines mutual obligations, rights, or terms of cooperation.
-
C.
treatyOf
Indicates a formal agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, defining their mutual obligations or terms.
-
D.
resultOfTreaties
Indicates that something exists, occurs, or holds true as a consequence or outcome of one or more treaties.
-
E.
treatyConcluded
Indicates that a formal agreement or treaty has been officially finalized and brought into force between the involved parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eee9b6b28481909332f83eb17e5170 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:56 a.m.