Triple

T2681223
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CSCE Final Act E56576 entity
Predicate includedPrinciple P26605 FINISHED
Object sovereign equality of states LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sovereign equality of states | Statement: [CSCE Final Act, includedPrinciple, sovereign equality of states]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedPrinciple
Context triple: [CSCE Final Act, includedPrinciple, sovereign equality of states]
  • A. usesPrinciple
    Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
  • B. establishesPrinciple
    Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
  • C. supportsPrinciple
    Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
  • D. typeOfPrinciples
    Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the kind or category of principles that another entity embodies, uses, or is governed by.
  • E. recognizesPrinciple chosen
    Indicates that an entity acknowledges the validity, authority, or applicability of a particular principle.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4a4b13fc81909dfdb3f23da46832 completed March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda2f7bf88190a1e3103dd014d871 completed March 7, 2026, 7:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd81ab9d08190b72b6104c6dbc769 completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.