Triple

T26810061
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject White Diamonds by Elizabeth Taylor E671963 entity
Predicate fragranceType P162359 FINISHED
Object eau de toilette LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: eau de toilette | Statement: [White Diamonds by Elizabeth Taylor, fragranceType, eau de toilette]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fragranceType
Context triple: [White Diamonds by Elizabeth Taylor, fragranceType, eau de toilette]
  • A. hasFragrance
    Indicates that one entity possesses or emits a particular scent or aroma associated with another entity.
  • B. fragranceInspiration
    Indicates that one entity serves as the creative or conceptual inspiration behind the fragrance of another entity.
  • C. hasFragranceForm chosen
    Indicates that an entity has a specific form or type of fragrance it is associated with or presented in.
  • D. scentPositioning
    Indicates the spatial placement or arrangement of a scent relative to other objects, locations, or reference points.
  • E. olfactoryFamily
    Indicates a relationship where one entity belongs to, or is categorized within, a particular olfactory family or scent classification defined by the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeb3225a3c8190aaf6746efeded2f3 completed April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d completed May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641dc8ff48190ab575d855616580c completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:28 a.m.