Triple
T26809213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maggie the Cat |
E671936
|
entity |
| Predicate | authorialStyleContext |
P27486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southern Gothic |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern Gothic | Statement: [Maggie the Cat, authorialStyleContext, Southern Gothic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorialStyleContext Context triple: [Maggie the Cat, authorialStyleContext, Southern Gothic]
-
A.
authorStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic characteristics or manner of expression associated with a particular author in their works.
-
B.
commentarialStyle
Indicates the manner or approach taken in writing or presenting commentary on a text, event, or subject.
-
C.
rhetoricalStyle
Indicates the characteristic manner or technique of expression used in communication, such as tone, structure, and persuasive strategies.
-
D.
authorOfStyle
Indicates that an entity is the creator or originator of a particular style, method, or artistic approach.
-
E.
stylisticFocus
Indicates a relationship where something is primarily concerned with, emphasizes, or is characterized by a particular style or set of stylistic features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb3225a3c8190aaf6746efeded2f3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:28 a.m.