Triple
T26803550
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Negapatam (1758) |
E671162
|
entity |
| Predicate | opposedPowers |
P42770
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Britain and France in the Indian Ocean |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Britain and France in the Indian Ocean | Statement: [Battle of Negapatam (1758), opposedPowers, Britain and France in the Indian Ocean]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposedPowers Context triple: [Battle of Negapatam (1758), opposedPowers, Britain and France in the Indian Ocean]
-
A.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
opposingAlliance
chosen
Indicates that two entities belong to rival or mutually opposed alliances or factions.
-
C.
opposedPoliticalEntity
Indicates that one political entity is in opposition or conflict with another in terms of policies, ideology, or power.
-
D.
isOppositionCounterpartOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the opposing or counterpart force, side, or position to another within a conflict, competition, or contrast.
-
E.
theoryOpposed
Indicates that one theory stands in opposition to, or conflicts with, another theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb31fbd888190a82dac5822e453bc |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68805b4848190b75da14996d52a38 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68609c0b08190a8e1238a4d97c270 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:24 a.m.