Triple
T26792674
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alaskan wilderness |
E670556
|
entity |
| Predicate | posesRisk |
P136373
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hypothermia |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hypothermia | Statement: [Alaskan wilderness, posesRisk, hypothermia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: posesRisk Context triple: [Alaskan wilderness, posesRisk, hypothermia]
-
A.
hasRiskFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity is exposed to or may suffer potential harm, loss, or adverse effects as a result of another entity.
-
B.
riskTakenFor
Indicates that one entity accepts or undertakes a risk for the benefit, protection, or sake of another entity.
-
C.
riskTaken
Indicates that an entity has undertaken an action or decision involving exposure to potential loss, harm, or uncertainty.
-
D.
riskElement
Indicates that one entity is a risk-related component, factor, or contributor associated with another entity within a risk context.
-
E.
riskDepicted
Indicates that a representation (such as an image, text, or symbol) portrays, illustrates, or conveys the presence or possibility of a particular risk.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb31d45f8819089f52ebdbc556218 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61fd623bc819091df736cf3419b99 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b3d23f481908dfec27adace900a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:17 a.m.