Triple
T26768734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clergy Reserves in Upper Canada |
E675019
|
entity |
| Predicate | disputedBeneficiary |
P50823
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Church of Scotland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Church of Scotland | Statement: [Clergy Reserves in Upper Canada, disputedBeneficiary, Church of Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputedBeneficiary Context triple: [Clergy Reserves in Upper Canada, disputedBeneficiary, Church of Scotland]
-
A.
laterDisputedBy
Indicates that a previously made claim, statement, or assertion is subsequently challenged, questioned, or contradicted by another party.
-
B.
disputeResolvedBy
Indicates that a particular dispute or conflict has been settled or resolved through the actions, decision, or intervention of a specified party or process.
-
C.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
D.
beneficiaryRight
Indicates that one entity holds a right or entitlement to receive benefits, advantages, or proceeds arising from another entity or arrangement.
-
E.
disputed
chosen
Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda85298819097ee1c38a3d772e7 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6192af84481908f00b324e81db779 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:01 a.m.