Triple
T2676831
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Julian Assange |
E56479
|
entity |
| Predicate | indictmentInitiallyUnsealed |
P35607
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2019 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2019 | Statement: [United States v. Julian Assange, indictmentInitiallyUnsealed, 2019]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: indictmentInitiallyUnsealed Context triple: [United States v. Julian Assange, indictmentInitiallyUnsealed, 2019]
-
A.
firstIndictmentIssued
Indicates that an initial formal criminal charge has been officially filed against an entity for the first time in a given case or context.
-
B.
dateFirstIndictmentsIssued
chosen
Indicates the date on which the first formal indictments in a particular case or investigation were officially issued.
-
C.
numberOfIndictedPersonsApproximate
Indicates an approximate count of persons who have been formally indicted in a given context or case.
-
D.
prosecuted
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
-
E.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4a4b13fc81909dfdb3f23da46832 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda2f7bf88190a1e3103dd014d871 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd81ab9d08190b72b6104c6dbc769 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.