Triple
T26765443
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | up quark |
E674924
|
entity |
| Predicate | CKMPartners |
P161209
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strange quark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strange quark | Statement: [up quark, CKMPartners, strange quark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: CKMPartners Context triple: [up quark, CKMPartners, strange quark]
-
A.
CKMPartners
Indicates a partnership or collaborative relationship exists between the entities involved.
-
B.
councilPartner
Indicates a formal collaborative relationship in which an entity serves as a partner within or to a council.
-
C.
keyPartner
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a primary or strategically important partner to another, typically involving significant collaboration or mutual dependence.
-
D.
cooperationPartner
Indicates that two entities are engaged in a collaborative relationship, working together toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
-
E.
governingPartner
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary ruling or controlling partner in relation to another within a governance or leadership structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda85298819097ee1c38a3d772e7 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6192758648190ba2c0bfc9904994e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ad2eb48190ac1ed0090f13f7a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6142a0b988190b404d078f73c3cb9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:59 a.m.