Triple

T26761327
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Chief E674807 entity
Predicate notableTeamMemberRelationship P2649 FINISHED
Object Robotman NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Robotman | Statement: [The Chief, notableTeamMemberRelationship, Robotman]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableTeamMemberRelationship
Context triple: [The Chief, notableTeamMemberRelationship, Robotman]
  • A. rosterRelationship
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is listed as a member, participant, or component within another entity’s roster or lineup.
  • B. notableTeammate chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a teammate relationship with another entity who is particularly prominent, distinguished, or noteworthy.
  • C. notableTeamLeader
    Indicates that an entity serves as a prominent or distinguished leader of a particular team.
  • D. notableOpponentTeamMember
    Indicates that a specific team member is recognized as a particularly significant or noteworthy opponent in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. associatedWithTeamMember
    Indicates a relationship where an entity has a connection, involvement, or linkage with a specific member of a team.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eecda6e9dc81908452fab3ba17ed9b completed April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff1c91bbac8190b84012dee1cb3b2c completed May 9, 2026, 11:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff1c23ca508190bb5a435d765b7e53 completed May 9, 2026, 11:36 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:58 a.m.