Triple
T26752643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dora’s World Voyage |
E674582
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasIntendedExperience |
P188766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | family-friendly |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: family-friendly | Statement: [Dora’s World Voyage, hasIntendedExperience, family-friendly]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIntendedExperience Context triple: [Dora’s World Voyage, hasIntendedExperience, family-friendly]
-
A.
hasPastExperience
Indicates that an entity has previously engaged in or undergone the specified activity, role, or situation in the past.
-
B.
hasExperienceElement
Indicates that an experience is composed of, or includes, a specific constituent element or component.
-
C.
hasNotableExperience
Indicates that an entity has a significant or distinguished experience related to another entity or context.
-
D.
hasExperienceOf
Indicates that one entity has undergone, encountered, or lived through a particular event, situation, or activity associated with another entity.
-
E.
allegedlyExperienced
Indicates that an entity is claimed or reported to have undergone or had a particular experience, without asserting that the experience actually occurred.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda6e9dc81908452fab3ba17ed9b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbad1e94988190b86d447a68e65067 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba881b8e0819094790935152b99a1 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fbad1b3ba08190ad69e21461333f2e |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:54 a.m.