Triple
T267505
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pre-Raphaelite art |
E5763
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalSubject |
P494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | biblical scenes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: biblical scenes | Statement: [Pre-Raphaelite art, typicalSubject, biblical scenes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSubject Context triple: [Pre-Raphaelite art, typicalSubject, biblical scenes]
-
A.
typicalSpeaker
Indicates that the subject is a prototypical or characteristic speaker or source of utterances in the context of the object.
-
B.
subjectCanBe
Indicates that the subject has the potential or capability to assume, become, or be classified as the specified object or state.
-
C.
subjectMatter
Indicates the topic, theme, or content area that something (such as a work, document, or discussion) is about.
-
D.
typicalActivity
Indicates that an entity is commonly or characteristically engaged in a particular activity.
-
E.
hasNotableSubject
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2587daeb081909591b9d30f80a271 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25dacf60c8190a5c3ef455b9a8b20 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b70d99c819085d8381a313a2a34 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m.