Triple
T26742704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St. Francis, South Dakota |
E674308
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingTribalAuthority |
P98456
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rosebud Sioux Tribe |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rosebud Sioux Tribe | Statement: [St. Francis, South Dakota, governingTribalAuthority, Rosebud Sioux Tribe]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingTribalAuthority Context triple: [St. Francis, South Dakota, governingTribalAuthority, Rosebud Sioux Tribe]
-
A.
governingTribalPresence
Indicates that an entity holds governing authority or administrative control over a tribal presence in a given area or context.
-
B.
isTribalGovernmentOf
Indicates that a tribal government holds official governing authority over a specific tribe, community, or territory.
-
C.
associatedTribalGovernment
Indicates a relationship where an entity is formally linked or connected to a specific tribal government.
-
D.
tribalOrganization
Indicates that an entity is organized as, or formally recognized as, a tribal governing or social structure.
-
E.
hasTribalAuthority
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds recognized governing or decision-making power within a specific tribe or tribal community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda63a3881908095c47900692e65 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd2a215d6c8190a1a428ccaee603f1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd28ef19688190bb8370f2812a43e7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:50 a.m.