Triple
T26725616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Niyamasara |
E673826
|
entity |
| Predicate | commentariesOn |
P22246
|
FINISHED |
| Object | has multiple traditional Jain commentaries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: has multiple traditional Jain commentaries | Statement: [Niyamasara, commentariesOn, has multiple traditional Jain commentaries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commentariesOn Context triple: [Niyamasara, commentariesOn, has multiple traditional Jain commentaries]
-
A.
commentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
-
B.
metaCommentaryOn
Indicates that one piece of content provides commentary, reflection, or analysis about another piece of content, often discussing its form, structure, or status as a work rather than its subject matter.
-
C.
primaryCommentaryOn
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or authoritative commentary or interpretive discussion on another entity.
-
D.
hasCommentaryOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
-
E.
commentedOnBy
Indicates that an entity has received a comment authored or posted by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda481d08190aea69f2f7c745f56 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:42 a.m.