Triple
T26692118
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | optical transfer function |
E672913
|
entity |
| Predicate | isComplexValued |
P163066
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [optical transfer function, isComplexValued, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isComplexValued Context triple: [optical transfer function, isComplexValued, true]
-
A.
isRealValued
Indicates that the value or function in question takes values exclusively from the set of real numbers.
-
B.
isTotallyComplex
Indicates that something possesses a level of complexity that is complete, multifaceted, and not reducible to simpler or purely real/straightforward components.
-
C.
hasRealComponents
Indicates that an entity possesses components or parts whose values are real (non-complex) numbers.
-
D.
hasComplexPoints
Indicates that something possesses or includes points that are intricate, detailed, or composed of multiple interconnected parts.
-
E.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eecda2066c8190a344218afa5e89c1 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63639a84c81909d700a539b458b42 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f631850ae08190a0ba51e4f1e4ccb3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6352df6148190bc10772cd40bd7b3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 3:26 a.m.