Triple
T2667294
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Debs v. United States |
E55665
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalTestApplied |
P17991
|
FINISHED |
| Object | clear and present danger test |
E103580
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clear and present danger test | Statement: [Debs v. United States, legalTestApplied, clear and present danger test]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: clear and present danger test Context triple: [Debs v. United States, legalTestApplied, clear and present danger test]
-
A.
clear and present danger test
chosen
The clear and present danger test is a legal doctrine used by U.S. courts to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech and expression, particularly when such speech poses an immediate threat to public safety or national security.
-
B.
New York v. Quarles
New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
-
C.
Lemon test
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
D.
Public Security Preservation Law
The Public Security Preservation Law was a repressive Japanese statute enacted in the 1920s to suppress political dissent, especially socialist and communist movements, by criminalizing activities deemed threatening to the imperial state.
-
E.
Smith Act
The Smith Act is a 1940 U.S. federal law that criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the government and was widely used during the early Cold War to prosecute suspected communists.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e54de48190be708cd1cf8be073 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd98a4ee88190aa7ef914e316ba31 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:53 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69afa05b008881908049751b73e800d0 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:54 p.m.