Triple
T26659726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | President of the Senate |
E666607
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeSelectedBy |
P13666
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional designation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional designation | Statement: [President of the Senate, mayBeSelectedBy, constitutional designation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeSelectedBy Context triple: [President of the Senate, mayBeSelectedBy, constitutional designation]
-
A.
hasSelectionFor
Indicates that one entity holds or specifies a chosen option, subset, or configuration on behalf of another entity.
-
B.
mayBeFilledBy
Indicates that one entity has the potential or permission to be occupied, completed, or satisfied by another entity.
-
C.
canBeDesignatedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being assigned, labeled, or identified by another entity as its designation.
-
D.
isSelective
Indicates that the relationship or action involves choosing or affecting only certain specific entities or options while excluding others based on particular criteria.
-
E.
mayBeBoundBy
Indicates that one entity is potentially subject to being constrained, restricted, or obligated by another entity (such as a rule, agreement, or condition), without asserting that this binding actually occurs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cf8c7188190b9b00270a8a89164 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65aa07c048190a5df30d53d8f0cf5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f659cc571c819097e51e531961d812 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:36 a.m.