Triple

T26646320
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Betty Schaefer E668918 entity
Predicate relationshipContrastWith P108840 FINISHED
Object Norma Desmond NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norma Desmond | Statement: [Betty Schaefer, relationshipContrastWith, Norma Desmond]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipContrastWith
Context triple: [Betty Schaefer, relationshipContrastWith, Norma Desmond]
  • A. hasContrastingRelationshipWith chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which two entities are opposed, divergent, or markedly different in qualities, roles, or effects.
  • B. relationshipImpact
    Indicates how one entity’s relationship with another affects or changes those entities or their interaction.
  • C. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • D. relationshipToRelative
    Indicates the specific familial connection or kinship role that one person has in relation to a particular relative.
  • E. relationshipFocus
    Indicates a relationship where particular attention, priority, or emphasis is placed on the connection between two or more entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee9d00eb5481908d6c6d0ada2f0c9a completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feaa483fcc81909d8a46b38a8717bf completed May 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fea8c9d45c81908ccc8619e5fefac1 completed May 9, 2026, 3:23 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:31 a.m.