Triple
T26628574
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2009 Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar |
E668427
|
entity |
| Predicate | mintageType |
P161729
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proof |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proof | Statement: [2009 Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar, mintageType, proof]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mintageType Context triple: [2009 Abraham Lincoln Commemorative Silver Dollar, mintageType, proof]
-
A.
mintageType
chosen
Indicates the specific method or category of production used when minting a coin or similar numismatic item.
-
B.
yearsOfMinting
Indicates the span of years during which an item (such as a coin or stamp) was actively produced or issued.
-
C.
typeOfMint
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or variety of mint relative to another entity.
-
D.
coinsProduced
Indicates that a particular entity (such as a mint or authority) has produced or issued a specified set or quantity of coins.
-
E.
coinageType
Indicates the specific type or category of coinage associated with an entity, such as its denomination, series, or monetary classification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cff507c819092b95bf7219a702e |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62d53ad58819080c5227c7a729d15 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c15952881908a5ea0c25904afec |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:24 a.m.