Triple

T26614198
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Awjila E668011 entity
Predicate hasTenseAspectSystemType P5214 FINISHED
Object prefix-conjugation verbs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prefix-conjugation verbs | Statement: [Awjila, hasTenseAspectSystemType, prefix-conjugation verbs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTenseAspectSystemType
Context triple: [Awjila, hasTenseAspectSystemType, prefix-conjugation verbs]
  • A. hasTenseAspectSystem chosen
    Indicates that a language or clause employs a particular system for expressing tense and aspect distinctions.
  • B. hasTenseAspect
    Indicates that a verb or clause is associated with a specific grammatical tense and aspect configuration.
  • C. hasTense
    Indicates that an action, event, or state is associated with a specific grammatical tense (such as past, present, or future).
  • D. hasTenseAspectMoodMarkers
    Indicates that an expression includes explicit markers specifying its tense, aspect, and/or mood.
  • E. hasVerbAspect
    Indicates that a verb or verbal expression is associated with a particular grammatical aspect (such as perfective, imperfective, or progressive) describing the temporal structure of the action or state.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee9cfe16088190a3dddd68e3c7b1ea completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a8df16a88190a23820e64a3b1f92 completed May 3, 2026, 1:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a751d5e48190a77dcecbe7ef9f0b completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:18 a.m.