Triple

T26610673
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject North American harness racing E667911 entity
Predicate hasBettingFormat P151667 FINISHED
Object pari-mutuel wagering LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pari-mutuel wagering | Statement: [North American harness racing, hasBettingFormat, pari-mutuel wagering]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBettingFormat
Context triple: [North American harness racing, hasBettingFormat, pari-mutuel wagering]
  • A. hasBettingStructure chosen
    Indicates that there is a specific set of rules or format governing how bets are placed and progressed in a game or wagering context.
  • B. hasBetType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a specific type or category of bet.
  • C. usesBettingStructure
    Indicates that one entity employs or follows a particular betting structure in the context of wagering or games.
  • D. bettingStructure
    Indicates the rules and format governing how bets are placed, sized, and progressed within a wagering or game context.
  • E. hasTradingFormat
    Indicates that one entity is associated with, or conducted according to, a particular trading format or mode of trade.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee9cfd20348190bb1255d2603efb7a completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67257b0448190a13011af81c81449 completed May 2, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66ec3d3d48190ab2f2b71939e572e completed May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:16 a.m.