Triple
T26608920
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Acanthisittidae |
E667856
|
entity |
| Predicate | mostSpeciesStatus |
P160677
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extinct |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extinct | Statement: [Acanthisittidae, mostSpeciesStatus, extinct]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mostSpeciesStatus Context triple: [Acanthisittidae, mostSpeciesStatus, extinct]
-
A.
subjectSpeciesStatus
Indicates the conservation or biological status assigned to the subject species (e.g., endangered, native, invasive, protected).
-
B.
speciesStatus
Indicates the conservation or population status assigned to a species, such as whether it is endangered, threatened, or of least concern.
-
C.
speciesStatusOnEarth
Indicates the conservation or existence status of a species within the context of Earth.
-
D.
wildlifeStatus
Indicates the conservation or protection status assigned to wildlife, such as whether a species is endangered, threatened, or of least concern.
-
E.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfd20348190bb1255d2603efb7a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61576b3f48190bc87dcdf685b4532 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d7b1b0819095ddd3b5169f8ce2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6037bf7a081908862a8359be80cf8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:15 a.m.