Triple
T26607845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Honeyland |
E667830
|
entity |
| Predicate | examinesHumanImpactOnNature |
P162346
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Honeyland, examinesHumanImpactOnNature, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: examinesHumanImpactOnNature Context triple: [Honeyland, examinesHumanImpactOnNature, true]
-
A.
humanImpact
Indicates the effect or influence that human activities have on another entity, system, or environment.
-
B.
humanImpactLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which human activities affect or influence a given entity, system, or environment.
-
C.
landscapeImpact
Indicates how an action, project, or entity alters or affects the visual and physical character of a landscape.
-
D.
conservationImpact
Indicates the effect that an action, policy, or entity has on the preservation, protection, or restoration of natural ecosystems and biodiversity.
-
E.
hasEnvironmentalImpactOn
Indicates that one entity affects or alters the environmental conditions, quality, or ecological state of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfd20348190bb1255d2603efb7a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6250321088190ae3ed1dc9f2fcd03 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623a7539c8190b71797f583da9f63 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62473a38481909b919f88ffb5b492 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:15 a.m.