Triple
T26607843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Honeyland |
E667830
|
entity |
| Predicate | depictsTraditionalBeekeepingMethods |
P4703
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Honeyland, depictsTraditionalBeekeepingMethods, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: depictsTraditionalBeekeepingMethods Context triple: [Honeyland, depictsTraditionalBeekeepingMethods, true]
-
A.
beeRepresents
Indicates that one entity serves as a symbolic or representational stand-in for another entity within a given context.
-
B.
pastoralActivities
Indicates activities related to providing spiritual care, guidance, or religious leadership within a community.
-
C.
usesPastoralSetting
Indicates that the action or work is set in an idealized rural or countryside environment characteristic of pastoral themes.
-
D.
hasTraditionalAnimalBreed
Indicates that an entity is associated with or possesses an animal that belongs to a recognized traditional breed.
-
E.
traditionalLifestyle
chosen
Indicates that an entity follows or maintains long-established customs, practices, and ways of living, typically in contrast to modern or industrialized lifestyles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfd20348190bb1255d2603efb7a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f661b58ac48190907b6c6e9ccc2c59 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660eea4648190b0d5e24293607813 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:15 a.m.