Triple
T26606755
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chance Meeting |
E667794
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCollaborationOn |
P160674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Short Trip Home |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Short Trip Home | Statement: [Chance Meeting, isCollaborationOn, Short Trip Home]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCollaborationOn Context triple: [Chance Meeting, isCollaborationOn, Short Trip Home]
-
A.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
-
B.
isCollaborative
Indicates that two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
-
C.
usesCollaboration
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on collaborative methods, tools, or partnerships with another entity to achieve a shared goal or perform an activity.
-
D.
containsCollaboration
Indicates that one entity includes or involves a collaborative relationship or joint activity with another entity.
-
E.
collaborationOf
Indicates a relationship in which two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfd20348190bb1255d2603efb7a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f615745a8c8190a5ba397a1fcdfa3d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d7b1b0819095ddd3b5169f8ce2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6037bf7a081908862a8359be80cf8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 2:14 a.m.