Triple
T2660184
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mathews v. Eldridge |
E54707
|
entity |
| Predicate | determinedThat |
P16516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | written procedures and post-termination hearings could satisfy due process in disability benefit terminations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: written procedures and post-termination hearings could satisfy due process in disability benefit terminations | Statement: [Mathews v. Eldridge, determinedThat, written procedures and post-termination hearings could satisfy due process in disability benefit terminations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: determinedThat Context triple: [Mathews v. Eldridge, determinedThat, written procedures and post-termination hearings could satisfy due process in disability benefit terminations]
-
A.
determined
Indicates that an entity has firmly decided on a course of action or conclusion, typically after consideration or effort.
-
B.
concludedThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
C.
decisiveFor
Indicates that one entity plays a determining or conclusive role in bringing about a particular outcome, decision, or state of another entity.
-
D.
decidedIn
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
-
E.
resultDetermination
Indicates the process or criteria by which an outcome, decision, or result is established or concluded from given inputs or conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49e028948190b97e01d73548b1d9 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd94f3b1881909bd36cfe61c254a5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd81768748190bd965f367cf6ef37 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.