Triple
T26573240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minnesota ex rel. Floyd B. Olson |
E666881
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatorOffice |
P51651
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hennepin County Attorney |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hennepin County Attorney | Statement: [Minnesota ex rel. Floyd B. Olson, relatorOffice, Hennepin County Attorney]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatorOffice Context triple: [Minnesota ex rel. Floyd B. Olson, relatorOffice, Hennepin County Attorney]
-
A.
subjectOffice
Indicates the office or official position held by the subject in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
relatorGeneral
Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association between entities that does not fall under a more specialized relation type.
-
C.
governingOffice
Indicates the official position or office through which an entity exercises governing authority over a jurisdiction or organization.
-
D.
petitionerOffice
chosen
Indicates the office or organizational unit with which the petitioner is formally affiliated or from which the petitioner is acting.
-
E.
correspondingGovernmentOffice
Indicates that one entity is the official government office responsible for handling matters related to the other entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfa21c081909e4e36e087debfc6 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe920a437081908d5174e8cf7a53a6 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe919a9a6c8190acb4483f386e6db7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:59 a.m.