Triple
T26572702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hill v. Colorado |
E666866
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisprudentialSignificance |
P12084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | landmark case on the constitutionality of buffer zones under the First Amendment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: landmark case on the constitutionality of buffer zones under the First Amendment | Statement: [Hill v. Colorado, jurisprudentialSignificance, landmark case on the constitutionality of buffer zones under the First Amendment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisprudentialSignificance Context triple: [Hill v. Colorado, jurisprudentialSignificance, landmark case on the constitutionality of buffer zones under the First Amendment]
-
A.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
-
B.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
-
C.
legalSignificance
chosen
Indicates that something has recognized importance, effect, or consequence within a legal context or system.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
primaryJurisprudentialSchool
Indicates the main school of legal or jurisprudential thought with which an entity is affiliated or that it primarily follows.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfa21c081909e4e36e087debfc6 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f621fcea1481909b6f8b3af1ee6820 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f620debeb48190b7db395fb86cf8d9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:58 a.m.