Triple
T26572580
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ward v. Rock Against Racism |
E666863
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor |
P163883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | content-neutral speech regulations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: content-neutral speech regulations | Statement: [Ward v. Rock Against Racism, subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor, content-neutral speech regulations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor Context triple: [Ward v. Rock Against Racism, subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor, content-neutral speech regulations]
-
A.
subsequentCitationIn
Indicates that one work cites or references another work that appears later in a specified source or sequence.
-
B.
subsequentCitationBy
Indicates that one work is cited by another work that was produced or published at a later time.
-
C.
precedentFor
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
D.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
E.
usesLegalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or argument relies on, cites, or is based upon the legal precedent established by another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfa21c081909e4e36e087debfc6 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6416fbf4081909b0913c337927fc4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c663be481908f233d25d28713a4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f63fd4f7448190930c723ba7cfce62 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:58 a.m.