Triple
T26572016
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of Alabama ex rel. John Patterson, Attorney General |
E666851
|
entity |
| Predicate | relator |
P191344
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Patterson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Patterson | Statement: [State of Alabama ex rel. John Patterson, Attorney General, relator, John Patterson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relator Context triple: [State of Alabama ex rel. John Patterson, Attorney General, relator, John Patterson]
-
A.
relatorGeneral
Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association between entities that does not fall under a more specialized relation type.
-
B.
relatorDefinition
Indicates that something provides a formal description or specification that defines the nature or meaning of a relationship.
-
C.
representative
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as an official agent or spokesperson acting on behalf of another entity.
-
D.
appointedRelative
Indicates that one entity has formally assigned or designated another entity, who is a relative, to a specific role, position, or responsibility.
-
E.
subjectRelation
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relational role or connection to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee9cfa21c081909e4e36e087debfc6 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe91383a1c81909266e40c3c3ede6c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe8fde094081908f0f121664fbb5c7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:58 a.m.