Triple

T26562259
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elizabeth E666281 entity
Predicate romanticInterestInAnotherTimeline P161723 FINISHED
Object Lucas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lucas | Statement: [Elizabeth, romanticInterestInAnotherTimeline, Lucas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanticInterestInAnotherTimeline
Context triple: [Elizabeth, romanticInterestInAnotherTimeline, Lucas]
  • A. romanticRivalryWith
    Indicates a mutual competitive relationship in which two entities vie for the romantic attention or affection of the same person.
  • B. romanticInvolvementUnderAlias
    Indicates that two entities are romantically involved with each other while at least one of them is using an alias or false identity.
  • C. romanticallyObsessedWith
    Indicates a strong, often overwhelming romantic fixation or preoccupation that one entity has toward another.
  • D. hasRomanticTensionWith
    Indicates a mutual or one-sided romantic attraction or unresolved romantic interest existing between two entities.
  • E. romanticTriangleInvolves
    Indicates a romantic relationship structure in which three individuals are mutually or asymmetrically involved in overlapping romantic connections.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee9cf7e94481909f0d556b36e43572 completed April 26, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6200ac60481909895c61d050b1338 completed May 2, 2026, 4:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b3a8ae0819090189fbd8eb19f2f completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f61f109ef48190873bfe18638d2046 completed May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:53 a.m.