Triple

T26555185
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Glacial Lake Iroquois E671787 entity
Predicate waterLevelHigherThan P167749 FINISHED
Object present Lake Ontario level LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: present Lake Ontario level | Statement: [Glacial Lake Iroquois, waterLevelHigherThan, present Lake Ontario level]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: waterLevelHigherThan
Context triple: [Glacial Lake Iroquois, waterLevelHigherThan, present Lake Ontario level]
  • A. waterLevelRise
    Indicates that the level of water in a given area or container has increased over time.
  • B. waterLevelHighestIn
    Indicates that the referenced location or container has the greatest water level compared to a specified set of locations or containers.
  • C. waterLevelTrend
    Indicates the direction and rate at which a body of water’s level is changing over time (e.g., rising, falling, or stable).
  • D. hasNormalWaterLevel
    Indicates that an entity’s water level is within the expected or standard range, neither abnormally high nor low.
  • E. waterLevelThreat
    Indicates that the current water level poses a potential danger or risk relative to a defined safety threshold.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeb32163f08190af5f81282738e27a completed April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66cf092c881908d7034c9c2bc61d5 completed May 2, 2026, 9:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66abddc448190a488852f8abdeb2c completed May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f66c59de9881909ebbb7b0ae7ab495 completed May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:49 a.m.