Triple
T26546708
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HMS Macedonian |
E671552
|
entity |
| Predicate | engagedCommander |
P1197
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stephen Decatur |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stephen Decatur | Statement: [HMS Macedonian, engagedCommander, Stephen Decatur]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: engagedCommander Context triple: [HMS Macedonian, engagedCommander, Stephen Decatur]
-
A.
engagedWithCommander
Indicates that an entity is actively interacting, communicating, or collaborating with a commander in an operational or authoritative context.
-
B.
commander
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative military or organizational control over another entity or group.
-
C.
sideCommander
Indicates that an entity serves as the commanding officer or leader in charge of a particular side or faction in a conflict, operation, or organization.
-
D.
hasCommander
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer or leader of another entity.
-
E.
commanderForDefender
Indicates that an entity serves as the commanding officer or leader responsible for directing and overseeing a defending force or defender.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb32163f08190af5f81282738e27a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61a17a7788190946f7e32d63cd43f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611ab768c8190b1849c15a3e59dda |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:44 a.m.