Triple
T26543270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Daniel Andrews |
E671448
|
entity |
| Predicate | succeededBy (Premier of Victoria) |
P74672
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jacinta Allan |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jacinta Allan | Statement: [Daniel Andrews, succeededBy (Premier of Victoria), Jacinta Allan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: succeededBy (Premier of Victoria) Context triple: [Daniel Andrews, succeededBy (Premier of Victoria), Jacinta Allan]
-
A.
succeededBy (as Premier of Victoria)
chosen
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in holding the office of Premier of Victoria.
-
B.
succeededByPrimeMinister
Indicates that one prime minister directly follows another in office as their immediate successor.
-
C.
precededBy (as Premier of Victoria)
Indicates that one individual previously held the position of Premier of Victoria before another individual.
-
D.
succeededByAsChiefMinister
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in the role of Chief Minister.
-
E.
successorAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales
Indicates that one person assumed the role of Governor of New South Wales directly after another person, succeeding them in that office.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb3206e748190b90c85cc81f38c91 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7431c0eec81909ead443e07d75e18 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f74143cf708190a12d487884298437 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:42 a.m.