Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964) | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area, relatedSupremeCourtDecision, Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964)]

Target entity: Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964)
Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area, relatedSupremeCourtDecision, Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964)]

• A. Katzenbach v. McClung chosen
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• B. Katzenbach v. Morgan
  Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
• C. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
  South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
• D. Bolling v. Sharpe
  Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• E. Craig v. Boren
  Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: relatedSupremeCourtDecision
Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area, relatedSupremeCourtDecision, Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964)]

• A. chiefJusticeAtDecision
  Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
• B. notableSupremeCourtCase
  Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
• C. influencedCourtDecision
  Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
• D. relatedCase chosen
  Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
• E. associatedCourtCase
  Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
• F. None of above.